Comparison of two laser Doppler flowmetry systems for bone blood flow analysis
- 1 August 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Calcified Tissue International
- Vol. 43 (2) , 103-107
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02555155
Abstract
The development of laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) has provided a real-time, reliable method for monitoring capillary perfusion in multiple tissues. LDF has potential for the experimental and clinical assessment of bone blood flow. To compare the accuracy and ease of use of two commercially available laser Doppler flowmeters with different mechanisms for processing the Doppler-shifted component of light, estimates of bone blood flow were obtained in a sheep model using the two systems, and the values derived then compared with estimates of bone blood flow also obtained in a sheep using the technique of injection of labeled microspheres. The single-channel laser Doppler flowmeter, the LD 5000, processes the reference and Doppler-shifted beams on the surface of a single photodetector using optical heterodyning for measurement. The dual-channel flowmeter, the Periflux 2, uses two optical fibers to transmit reference and Doppler-shifted light to two separate photodetectors. The differential amplification and detection system improves the signal-to-noise ratio. Measurement of both metaphyseal (cancellous) and diaphyseal (cortical) blood flow using both LDF systems was compared with values obtained with an injection of85Sr-labeled microspheres in three sheep. The LDF measurements were repeated after occlusion of the left femoral artery, and a46Sc microsphere injection was performed prior to animal sacrifice. Two of the animals developed vasomotor instability, resulting in poor correlation between the measurements obtained with the Periflux 2, which is motion sensitive, and the values obtained with the microsphere method. High correlation was apparent in two of the three animals for the LD 5000 and the microsphere values. Four additional sheep were evaluated using only the Periflux 2, and the data collected yielded R values of 0.6–0.98. Both the single- and dual-channel LDF systems offer accurate assessment of local cortical and cancellous bone blood flow.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laser doppler flowmetry for bone blood flow measurement: Correlation with microsphere estimates and evaluation of the effect of intracapsular pressure on femoral head blood flowJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1986
- Bone blood flow measurementJournal of Biomedical Engineering, 1984
- Measurement of microvascular blood flow in cancellous bone using laser Doppler flowmetry and 133Xe-clearanceInternational Journal of Oral Surgery, 1983
- Comparison of two laser Doppler flowmeters for the monitoring of dermal blood flowMicrosurgery, 1983
- Use of tracer microspheres to measure bone blood flow in conscious dogsCalcified Tissue International, 1980
- Evaluation of a Laser Doppler Flowmeter for Measurement of Tissue Blood FlowIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1980
- An experimental model to study the relationship between blood flow and uptake for bone-seeking radionuclides in normal boneClinical Physics and Physiological Measurement, 1980
- LASER DOPPLER MEASUREMENT OF CUTANEOUS BLOOD FLOWJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 1977
- Determination of Cortical Blood Flow in Rabbit Femur by Radioactive MicrospheresActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1970
- Extraction Ratio and Bone Clearance of Sr 85 as a Measure of Effective Bone Blood FlowCirculation Research, 1965