Extra cytoproct mutant in Paramecium tetraurelia: Morphogenetical analysis of proters and opisthes

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
To account for the differences between proters and opisthes with regard to extra cytoproct morphogenesis in Paramecium tetraurelia, two hypotheses have been proposed and tested. (i) The differences may be a result of different actions of proter‐macronucleus and opisthe‐macronucleus. This hypothesis has been tested by cytoplasmically connecting the proter with the opisthe in the form of chains, some of which have only one macronucleus per chain. However, the connected proters and opisthes remain different in extra cytoproct morphogenesis, thus arguing against the hypothesis. (ii) The differences may be a result of differences between the proter and the opisthe with regard to the development of their posterior‐ventral cortex: proters have a newly‐developed posterior‐ventral cortex whereas opisthes receive the posterior‐ventral cortex from the pre‐fission mother animal. This hypothesis has been tested by surgically producing an opisthe with a newly‐regenerated posterior cortex. Such opisthes, however, remain different from proters in extra cytoproct morphogenesis. Thus no direct support for the second hypothesis is obtained. Also, proteropisthe difference in morphogenesis may be understood in terms of Wolpert's positional information hypothesis, by assuming that the anterior and posterior ends of a dividing animal serve as reference points for establishing a gradient and that positional information before separation of the two daughter animals leads to differences in extra cytoproct morphogenesis between them after separation.