Eyewitness identification: Simulating the "weapon effect."
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 13 (4) , 397-408
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01056411
Abstract
Investigated the effect of weapons on eyewitness recall and recognition in 86 university students, using an experimental paradigm in which a syringe served as weapon simulation. Ss were approached by an experimenter who was either holding a syringe or a pen and either did or did not threaten to administer an injection. Exposure to the syringe greatly decreased lineup recognition, while enhancing the accuracy of recall for hand cues. Threat of injection did not interact with the syringe manipulation. Investigation of individual differences indicated greater accuracy of recall for facial details among Ss with less fear of injections and greater cognitive abilitieKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Facial Recognition: Weapon Effect and Attentional Focus1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1987
- Some facts about "weapon focus."Law and Human Behavior, 1987
- The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variables.Law and Human Behavior, 1987
- Eyewitness identification: The importance of lineup models.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- Verbal descriptions of faces from memory: Are they diagnostic of identification accuracy?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985
- What can psychology say about the Neil v. Biggers criteria for judging eyewitness accuracy?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983
- On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness nonidentifications.Psychological Bulletin, 1980
- The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior.Psychological Review, 1959
- The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formationJournal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 1908