ETHNOGRAPHY AND ORTHOGRAPHY
- 1 October 1996
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
- Vol. 25 (3) , 327-352
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089124196025003002
Abstract
In this article, I make a methodological plea for the utility of transcribing in field research. I begin by noting that, despite much recent talk of the mutual relevance of ethnography and conversation analysis, transcribing has not been addressed as a topic in its own right. I consider the goals of transcribing from a conversation analytic perspective and compare these with the aims of producing field notes. Then, I explicate the process of transcribing, calling attention to problems that arise from conventional procedures for representing talk in texts. Consideration of the difficulties many ethnographers face in attempting to introduce audio and video tape recorders into their field sites leads me to examine the analytical advantages of transcribing with—and without—tape-recorded data.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Searching for universal features of conversationResearch on Language and Social Interaction, 1990
- Intention, meaning and strategy: Observations on constraints on interaction analysisResearch on Language and Social Interaction, 1990
- Ethnography and conversation analysis aftertalking cultureResearch on Language and Social Interaction, 1990
- Court Ordered Incompetence: Conversational Organization in Involuntary Commitment HearingsSocial Problems, 1988
- Building Cohesion Through Collaborative NarrationSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1988
- What's in a `Nyem'?Sociology, 1978
- Error correction as an interactional resourceLanguage in Society, 1974
- Kinesics and ContextPublished by University of Pennsylvania Press ,1971
- Jemez and Kiowa Correspondences in Reference to Kiowa-TanoanInternational Journal of American Linguistics, 1962
- Alienation from InteractionHuman Relations, 1957