New antiarrhythmic agents. 2,2,5,5-Tetramethyl-3-pyrroline-3-carboxamides and 2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrrolidine-3-carboxamides.
- 1 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Vol. 29 (7) , 1138-1152
- https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00157a005
Abstract
N-(.omega.-Aminoalkyl)-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-3-pyrroline- or -pyrrolidine-3-carboxamides were acylated on the primary amino group of the side chain by means of reactive acid derivatives (acid chlorides, activated esters, phthalic anhydrides, phthalimide, 2-alkyl-4H-3,1-benzoxazin-4-ones) or they were alkylated by forming the Schiff bases and subsequent sodium borohydride reduction. Other tetramethyl-3-pyrrolinecarboxamide compounds were synthesized by acylating the aminoalkyl compounds with 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-dibromo-4-piperidinone in a reaction involving Favorskii rearrangement. Saturation of the double bond of some pyrroline derivatives furnished the pyrrolidinecarboxamides. The new compounds of each type were active against aconitine-induced arrhythmia and several of them had higher activity and better chemotherapeutic index than quinidine. A few selected examples from each type of the active new compounds showed strong activity against ouabain-induced arrhythmia; for comparison known drugs such as lidocaine, mexiletine, and tocainide were selected. The most potent compounds were oxidized to the paramagnetic nitroxides and the latter were reduced to the N-hydroxy derivatives; these products had no or only decreased antiarrhythmic effect.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- New antiarrhythmic agents. 1. Primary .alpha.-amino anilidesJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1979
- Formation and reduction of a nitroxide radical by liver microsomesBiochemical Pharmacology, 1977
- THE EFFECTS OF PRONETHALOL, DICHLOROISOPRENALINE AND DISOPYRAMIDE ON THE TOXICITY TO THE HEART OF OUABAIN AND ANAESTHETICSBritish Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, 1963
- A SIMPLIFIED METHOD OF EVALUATING DOSE-EFFECT EXPERIMENTS1949