Significance of angiotensin type 1 receptor blockade: why are angiotensin II receptor blockers different?
- 18 November 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 84 (10) , 9-15
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00728-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mechanistic Differences of Various AT 1 -Receptor Blockers in Isolated Vessels of Different OriginHypertension, 1999
- The Antihypertensive Effect and Tolerability of Candesartan Cilexetil, a New Generation Angiotensin II Antagonist, in Comparison with LosartanBlood Pressure, 1998
- Absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, in manEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1997
- The efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with placebo in the treatment of patients with essential hypertensionClinical Therapeutics, 1996
- Losartan PotassiumDrugs, 1996
- Comparison of the angiotensin II antagonist losartan with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in patients with essential hypertensionJournal Of Hypertension, 1995
- Pharmacological profile of valsartan: a potent, orally active, nonpeptide antagonist of the angiotensin II AT1‐receptor subtypeBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1993
- Pharmacological characterization of the novel nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, BIBR 277British Journal of Pharmacology, 1993
- Inhibition of rabbit aortic angiotensin II (AII) receptor by CV-11974, a new nonpeptide AII antagonistBiochemical Pharmacology, 1993
- Renin, angiotensin and aldosterone system in pathogenesis and management of hypertensive vascular diseaseThe American Journal of Medicine, 1972