The Prestige Gap
- 1 August 1984
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Work and Occupations
- Vol. 11 (3) , 283-308
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888484011003002
Abstract
This article presents evidence from two small samples in the United States and in England that indicates that male and female incumbents in the same occupations are not accorded equal prestige. Respondents accorded men in traditionally male occupations, such as architecture, mining, and construction work, greater prestige than their female counterparts. Women received higher prestige ratings than men in such traditionally female occupations as elementary school teaching, nursing, and secretrial work. These differences persisted throughout the prestige hierarchy, and were most notable for male respondents. The implications of different ratings of male and female incumbents in the same occupations for theory and research are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the Intersubjectivity of Occupational Status Evaluations: A Test of a Key Assumption Underlying the "Wisconsin Model" of Status AttainmentSocial Forces, 1980
- Ransacking Mobility TablesContemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1980
- Prestige versus socioeconomic status in the attainment processes of American men and womenSocial Science Research, 1979
- Occupational Prestige in the Collective ConscienceSocial Forces, 1978
- Sex Structure of Occupations and Job MobilitySocial Forces, 1978
- A Comparison of Men's and Women's Intergenerational Mobility in the United StatesAmerican Sociological Review, 1975
- Social Class Measurement and Women's Occupational RolesSocial Forces, 1973
- Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal1Journal of Social Issues, 1972
- Patterns of Female Intergenerational Occupational Mobility: A Comparison with Male Patterns of Intergenerational Occupational MobilityAmerican Sociological Review, 1971
- National Comparisons of Occupational PrestigeAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1956