Prospective observational cohort study of time saved by prehospital thrombolysis for ST elevation myocardial infarction delivered by paramedics
- 3 July 2003
- Vol. 327 (7405) , 22-26
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7405.22
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate a system of prehospital thrombolysis, delivered by paramedics, in meeting the national service framework's targets for the management of acute myocardial infarction. Design Prospective observational cohort study comparing patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction considered for thrombolysis in the prehospital environment with patients treated in hospital. Setting The catchment area of a large teaching hospital, including urban and rural areas. Participants 201 patients presenting concurrently over a 12 month period who had changes to the electrocardiogram that were diagnostic of acute myocardial infarction or who received thrombolysis for suspected acute myocardial infarction. Main outcome measures Time from first medical contact to initiation of thrombolysis (call to needle time), number of patients given thrombolysis appropriately, and all cause mortality in hospital. Results The median call to needle time for patients treated before arriving in hospital (n=28) was 52 (95% confidence interval 41 to 62) minutes. Patients from similar rural areas who were treated in hospital (n=43) had a median time of 125 (104 to 140) minutes. This represents a median time saved of 73 minutes (P < 0.001). Sixty minutes after medical contact 64% of patients (18/28) treated before arrival in hospital had received thrombolysis; this compares with 4% of patients (2/43) in a cohort from similar areas. Median call to needle time for patients from urban areas (n=107) was 80 (78 to 93) minutes. Myocardial infarction was confirmed in 89% of patients (25/28) who had received prehospital thrombolysis; this compares with 92% (138/150) in the two groups of patients receiving thrombolysis in hospital. Conclusions Thrombolysis delivered by paramedics with support from the base hospital can meet the national targets for early thrombolysis. The system has been shown to work well and can be introduced without delay.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the time saved byprehospital initiation of reteplase forST-elevation myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Mortality and Prehospital Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 2000
- Call to needle times after acute myocardial infarction. New standard of 60 minutes has been proposed but may be too rigorous.1999
- Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hourThe Lancet, 1996
- Guidelines for the early management of patients with myocardial infarctionBMJ, 1994
- Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group.1994
- Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial.1993
- Prehospital Thrombolytic Therapy in Patients with Suspected Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners: Grampian region early anistreplase trial. GREAT Group.BMJ, 1992
- Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.1988