Defining attributes for scorecard construction in credit scoring
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Applied Statistics
- Vol. 27 (5) , 527-540
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760050076371
Abstract
In many domains, simple forms of classification rules are needed because of requirements such as ease of use. A particularly simple form splits each variable into just a few categories, assigns weights to the categories, sums the weights for a new object to be classified, and produces a classification by comparing the score with a threshold. Such instruments are often called scorecards. We describe a way to find the best partition of each variable using a simulated annealing strategy. We present theoretical and empirical comparisons of two such additive models, one based on weights of evidence and another based on logistic regression.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving the Practice of Classifier Performance AssessmentNeural Computation, 2000
- The impact of changing populations on classifier performancePublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1999
- Comparing classifiers when the misallocation costs are uncertainPattern Recognition, 1999
- Dynamic Supervised Learning: Some Basic Issues and Application AspectsPublished by Springer Nature ,1997
- Calculating risk and outcome: The society of thoracic surgeons databaseThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996
- Predictability and PredictionJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1993
- Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution ProgramsPublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- Bayesian Reasoning in MedicineMedical Decision Making, 1991