EPR: The Correlations are Still A Mystery

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This paper is a critical discussion of a recent article by Bas van Fraassen (1985) in which he suggests the following view: we should admit that we have no explanation of the EPR correlations, but refuse to consider the correlations as mysterious nevertheless (pp. 126–128). We shall focus on just three of the claims made by van Fraassen in support of this view. The three claims are these: (1)The EPR correlations cannot be explained by signals being transmitted from one component of an EPR compound to the other (pp. 114–115). (2)There is, in the EPR situation, no empirically verifiable action at a distance (pp. 124–126). (3)The demand for an explanation of the EPR correlations is similar to the Aristotelian demand of the post-Newtonian proponents of the law of inertia to explain what keeps a body moving if there are no forces impressed on it (pp. 126–128).

This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit: