Quality indicators for primary care mental health services
Open Access
- 1 April 2003
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Vol. 12 (2) , 100-106
- https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.2.100
Abstract
Objectives: To identify a generic set of face valid quality indicators for primary care mental health services which reflect a multi-stakeholder perspective and can be used for facilitating quality improvement. Design: Modified two-round postal Delphi questionnaire. Setting: Geographical spread across Great Britain. Participants: One hundred and fifteen panellists representing 11 different stakeholder groups within primary care mental health services (clinical psychologist, health and social care commissioner, community psychiatric nurse, counsellor, general practitioner, practice nurse/district nurse/health visitor, psychiatrist, social worker, carer, patient and voluntary organisations). Main outcome measures: Face validity (median rating of 8 or 9 on a nine point scale with agreement by all panels) for assessing quality of care. Results: A maximum of 334 indicators were rated by panels in the second round; 26% were rated valid by all panels. These indicators were categorised into 21 aspects of care, 11 relating to general practices and 10 relating to health authorities or primary care groups/trusts. There was variation in the total number of indicators rated valid across the different panels. Overall, GPs rated the lowest number of indicators as valid (41%, n=138) and carers rated the highest number valid (91%, n=304). Conclusions: The quality indicators represent consensus among key stakeholder groups in defining quality of care within primary care mental health services. These indicators could provide a guide for primary care organisations embarking on quality improvement initiatives in mental health care when addressing national targets and standards relating to primary care set out in the National Service Framework for Mental Health for England. Although many of the indicators relate to parochial issues in UK service delivery, the methodology used in the development of the indicators could be applied in other settings to produce locally relevant indicators.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consensus methods in prescribing researchJournal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics, 2001
- Defining quality of careSocial Science & Medicine, 2000
- Research guidelines for the Delphi survey techniqueJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2000
- The required role of the psychiatric‐ mental health nurse in primary health‐ care: an augmented Delphi studyNursing Inquiry, 2000
- Development and validation of clinical indicators for mental health nursing practiceAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2000
- Essential components of schizophrenia care: a Delphi approachActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1998
- [Prevention priorities in mental health in Geneva: a study using the Delphi technic].1998
- A Model to Assess the Usefulness of Performance IndicatorsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1996
- The Quality of Care and the Quality of Measuring ItNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Priorities for research on mental health in primary care settingsPsychological Medicine, 1985