Guidelines and management of mild hypertensive conditions in pregnancy in rural general practices in Scotland: issues of appropriateness and access
Open Access
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Vol. 12 (4) , 286-290
- https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.4.286
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the diagnosis and management of mild non-proteinuric hypertension in pregnancy in rural general practices against guideline recommendations. Design: Postal survey and telephone interview. Setting: All 174 designated rural general practices in Scotland. Sample: 171 GPs and 158 midwives responsible for antenatal care stratified by distance from a specialist maternity hospital. Main outcome measures: Accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of management compared with guideline. Results: At least one respondent replied for 91% (158/174) of rural practices. Response rates were 68% (117/170) for GPs and 77% (121/158) for midwives. Both GP and midwife replied for 46% (80/174) of practices. Most GPs (80%, 87/109) and midwives (63%, 71/113) overdiagnosed the scenario. Intended management was therefore most often referral or admission to specialist hospital (59%, 132/224), both courses of action beyond guideline recommendations. There was an association between distance of practice from specialist maternity hospital and professionals’ report of intended referral or admission. Explanatory factors from telephone interviews included a poor knowledge base, cautious risk assessment, and perceived inflexibility of guidelines for remote situations. Conclusions: There is a lack of accuracy in the diagnosis of a common antenatal problem and intended management is consistent with overdiagnosis. The results suggest that women in rural settings may experience more antenatal referrals and admissions than are clinically appropriate according to the guidelines. At a time of increasing centralisation of maternity services, this could increase inappropriate referrals and increase costs to service and patients. Quality of care may be improved by developing consensual local guidelines with rural maternity care professionals and support maintained skills and confidence in decision making.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rural deprivation: reflecting reality.2001
- Rural and urban differences in stage at diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancersBritish Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Antenatal transfer of rural women to perinatal centresAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000
- Most British research and development in primary care arises outside rural areasBMJ, 1997
- Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed careThe Lancet, 1996
- Should obstetricians see women with normal pregnancies? A multicentre randomised controlled trial of routine antenatal care by general practitioners and midwives compared with shared care led by obstetriciansBMJ, 1996
- Coronary revascularisation: why do rates vary geographically in the UK?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1995
- Eclampsia in the United KingdomBMJ, 1994
- Development of clinical guidelines in a health district: an attempt to find consensus.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1992
- Some factors affecting attendance at ante-natal clinicsSocial Science & Medicine. Part D: Medical Geography, 1981