ECOLOGICAL COSTS AND BENEFITS OF DEFENSES IN NECTAR
- 1 November 2005
- Vol. 86 (11) , 2968-2978
- https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0118
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do floral herbivores respond to variation in flower characteristics in Gelsemium sempervirens (Loganiaceae), a distylous vine?American Journal of Botany, 2002
- The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communitiesOecologia, 2001
- DOWN THE TUBE: POLLINATORS, PREDATORS, AND THE EVOLUTION OF FLOWER SHAPE IN THE ALPINE SKYPILOT, POLEMONIUM VISCOSUMEvolution, 2001
- ARE NECTAR ROBBERS CHEATERS OR MUTUALISTS?Ecology, 2000
- Geitonogamy: The neglected side of selfingTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1993
- Attraction, deterrence or intoxication of bees (Apis mellifera) by plant allelochemicalsChemoecology, 1993
- Consequences of Floral Variation for Male and Female Reproduction in Experimental Populations of Wild Radish, Raphanus sativus L.Evolution, 1991
- The evolution and adaptive significance of heterostylyTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1990
- A Comparison of Pollen and Fluorescent Dye Carry‐Over by Natural Pollinators of Ipomopsis Aggregata (Polemoniaceae)Ecology, 1982
- Adaptive Significance of Toxic NectarThe American Naturalist, 1981