Evidence for late Paleozoic and Mesozoic non-dipole fields provides an explanation for the Pangea reconstruction problems
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
- Vol. 187 (1-2) , 71-81
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-821x(01)00285-0
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reconstructions of the continents around the North Atlantic at about the 60th parallelEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 2001
- Resolving the problem of shallow magnetizations of Tertiary age in Asia: insights from paleomagnetic data from the Qiangtang, Kunlun, and Qaidam blocks (Tibet, China), and a new hypothesisJournal of Geophysical Research, 1999
- Shallow bias of paleomagnetic inclinations in the Paleozoic and PrecambrianEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 1998
- The time‐averaged paleomagnetic field 0–5 MaJournal of Geophysical Research, 1996
- Long‐term geometry of the geomagnetic field for the last five million years: An updated secular variation databaseGeophysical Research Letters, 1994
- Did a large departure from the geocentric axial dipole hypothesis occur during the Eocene? Evidence from the magnetic polar wander path of EurasiaEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 1993
- Pangea in Permian to Jurassic timeTectonophysics, 1991
- The time‐averaged paleomagnetic fieldReviews of Geophysics, 1990
- A palaeomagnetic test of the axial dipole assumption and implications for continental distribution through geological timePhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1989
- Supposed Permo-Triassic megashear between Laurasia and GondwanaNature, 1983