Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests
- 1 June 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 6 (4) , 411-423
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060402
Abstract
Diagnostic tests are traditionally characterized by simple measures of efficacy such as the sensitivity and the specificity. These measures, though widely recognized and easy to understand, are subject to definitional arbitrariness. Moreover, studies constructed to estimate the sensitivity and specificity are susceptible to a variety of biases. In this paper the various potential problems are described with reference to examples from the diagnostic literature. These difficulties have implications for the design of diagnostic test evaluations, and the choice of suitable measures of test efficacy.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- A model for assessing the sensitivity and specificity of tests subject to selection biasJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- The influence of uninterpretability on the assessment of diagnostic testsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- A sequential approach to the diagnosis of coronary artery disease using multivariate analysisAmerican Heart Journal, 1985
- The Declining Specificity of Exercise Radionuclide VentriculographyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Diagnostic value of exercise electrocardiography and thallium myocardial scintigraphy in patients without previous myocardial infarction: a Bayesian approach.Circulation, 1981
- Methodology for the assessment of new dichotomous diagnostic testsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1981
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Basic principles of ROC analysisSeminars in Nuclear Medicine, 1978
- The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graphJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1975