Estimation of earthquake source parameters by the inversion of waveform data: Global seismicity, 1981-1983
- 1 December 1986
- journal article
- Published by Seismological Society of America (SSA) in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
- Vol. 76 (6) , 1515-1541
- https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0760061515
Abstract
A waveform inversion algorithm, based on optimal filter theory, has been applied to the P waves from 260 of the largest earthquakes occurring during the years 1981 through 1983. Estimates of average focal depth, scalar moment, and deviatoric source mechanism have been obtained. For all except the largest events (M0 > 1027 dyne-cm), the scalar moments obtained in this study are close to, but somewhat larger than, the Harvard centroid-moment tensor (CMT) scalar moments. The CMT estimates of scalar moment are probably biased to low values due to the way unmodeled lateral heterogeneity affects the fitting procedure. For the largest events, however, source complexity can bias the scalar moments determined in this study to lower values, and the CMT scalar moments are probably more accurate. The moment tensor, CMT, and U.S. Geological Survey first-motion source mechanisms have been objectively compared by computing the locations of the vector representations of the mechanisms on the unit sphere. We find that the similarities and differences between these mechanisms can be related to the uncertainties inherent in each method for certain types of earthquakes: (1) lack of constraint on one of the nodal planes for dip-slip type mechanisms from first-motion analysis; (2) lack of resolution of the moment tensor elements defining the dip-slip component of faulting for shallow-focus earthquakes in the CMT method; and (3) lack of resolution of the moment tensor elements defining the strike-slip component of faulting in the P-wave inversion method used here. Thus, on the average, the first-motion and CMT methods yield the more reliable mechanisms for strike-slip-type earthquakes, and the method used in this study gives a more reliable result for shallow-focus earthquakes with dip-slip-type mechanisms. Finally, both of the moment tensor methods should yield reliable solutions for intermediate- and deep-focus earthquakes.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Centroid-moment tensor solutions for October–December, 1983Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1984
- Systematic analysis of deep seismicity: 200 centroid-moment tensor solutions for earthquakes between 1977 and 1980Geophysical Journal International, 1984
- Centroid-moment tensor solutions for July–September, 1983Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1984
- Centroid-moment tensor solutions for April–June, 1983Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1983
- Global seismicity of 1982: centroid-moment tensor solutions for 308 earthquakesPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1983
- Centroid-moment tensor solutions for January–March, 1983Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1983
- Estimation of earthquake source parameters by the inversion of waveform data: synthetic waveformsPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1982
- Preliminary reference Earth modelPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1981
- A new method for computing synthetic seismogramsGeophysical Journal International, 1978
- Distribution of stresses in the descending lithosphere from a global survey of focal‐mechanism solutions of mantle earthquakesReviews of Geophysics, 1971