Frameworked futures: Intransigence and flexibility in the northern Ireland elections of may 30 1996
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Irish Political Studies
- Vol. 12 (1) , 23-47
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07907189708406572
Abstract
The elections of May 30th 1996 were a precursor to potentially extensive negotiations over the future of Northern Ireland. However, the rejection of compromise by even their chosen representatives among Protestant voters may effectively shackle attempts at negotiation. Protestant inflexibility over constitutional change, or the proposals for revised electoral procedures, power sharing, parity of esteem, or a North‐South body contained within the Framework Document likewise contrasts markedly with the wide range of options endorsed by Catholics. The explanation for this intransigence derives from the threat posed by any compromises to the position of the unionist community. It provides a significant but not insuperable constraint on prospects for negotiated solutions to the Northern Irish conflict.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond the Sectarian Divide: The Social Bases and Political Consequences of Nationalist and Unionist Party Competition in Northern IrelandBritish Journal of Political Science, 1997
- Afterword: What is framed in the Framework Documents?Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1995
- Party competition in an ethnic dual party systemEthnic and Racial Studies, 1995
- Political change and the Protestant working classRace & Class, 1995
- The Edge of the UnionPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1994
- PUBLIC OPINION AND NORTHERN IRISH FUTURESThe Political Quarterly, 1992
- Conflict regulation and party competition in Northern IrelandEuropean Journal of Political Research, 1991
- The Limits to Coercive Consociationalism in Northern IrelandPolitical Studies, 1989