Experience with Reduction Mammaplasty Combined with Breast Conservation Therapy in the Treatment of Breast Cancer
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 111 (3) , 1102-1109
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000046491.87997.40
Abstract
As the inclusion criteria for breast conservation therapy have continued to evolve to include lower quadrant tumors, very large breasts, and central tumors, the potential for significant disfigurement after breast conservation therapy has also increased. This has led some centers to develop coordinated oncology-plastic surgery approaches to ensure both adequated cancer resection and aesthetic appearance to the breasts. The authors applied this principle to a specific group of breast cancer patients—women with macromastia—who would benefit from reduction mammaplasty. Eleven women were identified from the senior author's (S.L.S.) reconstructive practice who underwent breast conservation therapy followed by breast reconfiguration and bilateral reduction mammaplasty. Preoperative brassiere sizes ranged from 34D to 46D. All women had immediate reduction after frozen sections from the lumpectomy/partial mastectomy margins were determined to be negative. A total of 22 reduction mammaplasties were performed (eight freenipple grafts, five inferior pedicle flaps, seven superomedial pedicle flaps, and two superolateral flaps) and an average of 1085 g was removed per breast. All patients underwent radiation therapy postoperatively. There were eight minor complications in six patients (one hematoma, one keloid, one radiation burn, two cases of nipple hypopigmentation, and three cases of fat necrosis). After an average of 24 months' follow-up, there were no local recurrences and one death from distant metastasis. Seven of the 11 patients were available and agreed to rate their aesthetic satisfaction on the basis of a scale from 1 to 4, with 4 being the best. The mean satisfaction score was 3.3. Aesthetic outcomes before radiation therapy and after radiation therapy were evaluated by a panel of plastic surgery residents blinded to the purpose of the study. Using a scale of 1 to 4, the aesthetic mean before radiation therapy was 2.9 and the aesthetic mean after radiation therapy was 3.03. By combining breast conservation therapy with breast reconfiguration or reduction in largebreasted women, multiple benefits are derived. Larger segmental or partial mastectomies can be performed without disfigurement risk, ensuring adequate surgical margins. Immediate reconfiguration of the breast with reduction of the contralateral side creates symmetric, aesthetically pleasing breasts; allows contralateral breast tissue to be evaluated; and spares women from undergoing a second operative procedure. Such a coordinated program gives women an important boost, both physically and psychologically, during management of their breast cancer.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Approach to the Repair of Partial Mastectomy DefectsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1999
- Experience with Reduction Mammaplasty following Breast Conservation Surgery and Radiation TherapyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1998
- Reduction MammaplastyAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 1998
- Integration of Plastic Surgery in the Course of Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer to Improve Cosmetic Results and Radicality of Tumor ExcisionPublished by Springer Nature ,1998
- Reanalysis and Results after 12 Years of Follow-up in a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy with Lumpectomy with or without Irradiation in the Treatment of Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Conservative Treatment of Breast Cancers by Mammaplasty and IrradiationPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1995
- Primary breast irradiation in large-breasted or heavy women: Analysis of cosmetic outcomeInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1991