A Critique of Contemporary Community Health Promotion Approaches: Based on a Qualitative Review of Six Programs in Maine
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Journal of Health Promotion
- Vol. 7 (3) , 208-220
- https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-7.3.208
Abstract
Purpose.: This article reports on a process evaluation of three Planned Approach to Community Health (PATCH) projects and three Community Chronic Disease Prevention Programs (CCDPP) that operated in the State of Maine. PATCH and CCDPP are similar approaches to community health promotion developed and disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control. The evaluators studied how the Planned Approach to Community Health and the Community Chronic Disease Prevention Program models worked as community health strategies across the six field sites. Research Methods Used.: Qualitative methods were used in a cross-case comparison of the six field sites. In studying each site, the evaluators focused on six stages common to both the Planned Approach to Community Health and the Community Chronic Disease Prevention Program models: Stage 1: conducting a community needs assessment; Stage 2: analyzing needs assessment data; Stage 3: setting priorities for the project based on the data; Stage 4: implementing activities; Stage 5: producing process outcomes; and Stage 6: institutionalizing the project. The analysis focused on how each of the six communities traversed these stages. Summary of Findings.: Eight recommendations for refining Planned Approach to Community Health and Community Chronic Disease Prevention strategies resulted from the study: 1) do a community capacity assessment prior to initiating a community needs assessment; 2) do not overly rely on Behavioral Risk Factor Surveys; 3) analyze needs assessment data rapidly for community consumption; 4) allow flexibility and community input in determining priority health objectives; 5) provide technical assistance throughout a project, not just in the beginning; 6) fund at least one full-time local coordinator and extensive capacity building; 7) emphasize multiple interventions around one chronic condition at a time; and 8) emphasize program institutionalization. Conclusions.: Community development approaches like Planned Approach to Community Health and Community Chronic Disease Prevention are promising health promotion strategies. To be optimally effective, however, these strategies need refinement based on systematic study in field settings. Because this study was limited to six sites in Maine, some of these findings may have limited generalizability.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methods in Program EvaluationEvaluation Review, 1989
- The Use of Qualitative Evaluation Methods to Test Internal ValidityEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1989
- Measuring and Tracking Education Program Implementation: The Minnesota Heart Health Program ExperienceHealth Education Quarterly, 1989
- A model for the institutionalization of health promotion programsFamily & Community Health, 1989
- Theory and delivery of health programming in the community: The Pawtucket Heart Health ProgramPreventive Medicine, 1987
- Organizational and community approaches to community-wide prevention of heart disease: The first two years of the pawtucket heart health programPreventive Medicine, 1986
- Community-wide prevention strategies: Evaluation design of the Minnesota Heart Health ProgramJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- Avoiding Type III Errors in Health Education Program Evaluations: A Case StudyHealth Education Quarterly, 1985
- THE STANFORD FIVE-CITY PROJECT: DESIGN AND METHODSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- Organization for a Community Cardiovascular Health Program: Experiences from the Minnesota Heart Health ProgramHealth Education Quarterly, 1984