Endothelium-derived relaxing factor/nitric oxide modulates angiotensin II action in the isolated microperfused rabbit afferent but not efferent arteriole.
Open Access
- 1 May 1993
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Clinical Investigation in Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Vol. 91 (5) , 2012-2019
- https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI116423
Abstract
It has been reported that sensitivity to angiotensin II (Ang II) is higher in efferent (Ef) than afferent (Af) arterioles (Arts). We tested the hypothesis that this is due to arteriolar differences in the interaction between Ang II and endothelium-derived relaxing factor/nitric oxide (EDNO). Rabbit Af-Arts with glomerulus intact were microperfused in vitro at a constant pressure. Ef-Arts were perfused from the distal end of either the Af-Art (orthograde perfusion) or the Ef-Art (retrograde perfusion) to eliminate influences of the Af-Art or glomerulus, respectively. Ang II did not alter Af-Art luminal diameter until the concentration reached 10(-9) M, which decreased the diameter by 11 +/- 2.6% (n = 11; P < 0.002). In contrast, Ef-Arts became significantly constricted at concentrations as low as 10(-11) M with either perfusion. Surprisingly, the decrease in Ef-Art diameter at 10(-10), 10(-9), and 10(-8) M was significantly greater with retrograde perfusion (44 +/- 6.9%, 70 +/- 5.6%, and 74 +/- 4.1%, respectively; n = 5) than with orthograde perfusion (16 +/- 4.2%, 25 +/- 2.9%, and 35 +/- 3.5%; n = 9). ENDO synthesis inhibition with 10(-4) M nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) decreased the diameter to a greater extent in Af-Arts (22 +/- 3.0%; n = 11) compared to Ef-Arts with either orthograde (9.5 +/- 2.3%; n = 8) or retrograde perfusion (1.2 +/- 2.1%; n = 6). With L-NAME pretreatment, Af-Art constriction induced by 10(-10) M (14 +/- 4.0%, n = 9) and 10(-9) M Ang II (38 +/- 3.9%) was significantly greater compared to nontreated Af-Arts. In contrast, L-NAME pretreatment had no effect on Ang II-induced constriction in Ef-Arts with either perfusion. In conclusion, this study demonstrates higher sensitivity of Ef-Arts to Ang II, particularly with retrograde perfusion. Our results suggest that EDNO significantly modulates the vasoconstrictor action of Ang II in Af-Arts II but not Ef-Arts, contributing to the differential sensitivity to Ang II.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- EDRF-angiotensin II interactions in rat juxtamedullary afferent and efferent arteriolesAmerican Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, 1992
- Role of angiotensin II in the altered renal function of congestive heart failure.Circulation Research, 1984
- Control of glomerular filtration rate: role of intrarenally formed angiotensin IIAmerican Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, 1984
- Segmental effects of norepinephrine and angiotensin II on isolated renal microvesselsAmerican Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, 1983
- Similarities of genetic (spontaneous) hypertension. Man and rat.Circulation Research, 1981
- Reversal of renal cortical actions of angiotensin II by verapamil and manganeseKidney International, 1979
- Reactivity of glomerular afferent and efferent arterioles in renal hypertensionKidney International, 1979
- Effect of exogenous and endogenous angiotensin II in the isolated perfused rat kidneyAmerican Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, 1978
- Control of glomerular filtration rate by renin-angiotensin systemAmerican Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, 1977
- Effects of norepinephrine and angiotensin II on the determinants of glomerular ultrafiltration and proximal tubule fluid reabsorption in the rat.Circulation Research, 1975