Strategies in the Comprehension of Relative Clauses
- 1 July 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Language and Speech
- Vol. 18 (3) , 204-212
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097501800302
Abstract
An experiment is described to test the hypothesis that errors in the comprehension of relative clauses in English are caused by perceptual strategies resorted to when the normal capacity of the processing channel is exceeded. Native children, foreign adults, and native adults were asked to show Subject and Object relations in sentences that were read to them. The same type of error pattern was found in native children and foreign adults with single embedded clauses, in native adults with double embedded clauses, and, to a lesser extent, in native adults with single embedded clauses. The dominating strategies appeared to be that the first Noun Phrase was the Subject and the Noun Phrase following the verb the Object. These results suggest that the difficulty of relative clauses is indeed due to the load they put on the processing system and that an overload is reached with a single embedding for children and foreign adults, and with a double embedding for most native adults.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surface structure reconsideredPerception & Psychophysics, 1970
- The nonperceptual reality of the phonemeJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970
- Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surf ace structure on decision timesPerception & Psychophysics, 1969
- Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity, II : Verb structurePerception & Psychophysics, 1968
- A study of the ability to decode grammatically novel sentencesJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1967
- Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexityPerception & Psychophysics, 1967
- Observations with self-embedded sentencesPsychonomic Science, 1966
- Free recall of self-embedded english sentencesInformation and Control, 1964