BOP/VIP - A new platinum-intensive chemotherapy regimen for poor prognosis germ cell tumours
- 1 March 1991
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 2 (3) , 203-211
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057906
Abstract
Ninety-one patients with poor prognosis non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) were treated with an initial intensive chemotherapy schedule. Suitable patients fulfilled one or more of the following criteria: lymph node metastases greater than 10 cm diameter; liver, brain or bone metastases; serum HCG level greater than 50 000 IU/L; and extragonadal primary tumours. Treatment consisted of 3 cycles of bleomycin, vin-cristine and cisplatin (BOP) administered at 10 day intervals, followed by 3 cycles of etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin (VIP) at 21 day intervals. A total of 64 patients (70%) achieved a complete remission. This comprised 46 patients who received BOP/VIP only, and 18 patients who received additional chemotherapy after BOP ATP. Of these 64 patients, 51 underwent complete surgical resection of residual masses, including 11 in whom there was evidence of teratoma with cellular atypia or non-germ cell cancer in the resected tissue. A further 9 patients had persisting unresected radiological masses in the presence of marker complete remission. The overall response rate was 80%. Currently 57 patients (63%) remain alive and free from disease progression. The median follow-up period is 90 weeks (range 24–206 weeks), with a 2 yr actuarial progression-free survival of 66% (95% c.i. 55–77%). Major toxicity was myelosuppression, occurring during the VIP arm of therapy, with a median nadir WBC of 1.1 × 109/L and median platelet count of 51 × 109/L. Other toxicity included peripheral neuropathy (WHO Grade 2 and 3 in 22%). We conclude that treatment results with the BOP/VIP schedule in this poor prognosis patient group are at least comparable with other schedules, and toxicity is manageable. A randomised prospective trial comparing BOP/VIP with standard therapy using BEP (bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin) has now opened to assess whether an advantage can be shown for the initial intensive therapy.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intensive induction chemotherapy for poor risk non-seminomatous germ cell tumoursEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1989
- Testicular Cancer: The Quest ContinuesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1988
- Chemotherapy for Poor Risk Germ Cell Tumours An Independent Evaluation of the POM B/ACE RegimeBritish Journal of Urology, 1988
- Results of treatment of non seminomatous germ cell tumours; 122 consecutive cases in the West of Scotland, 1981-1985British Journal of Cancer, 1988
- Treatment of Disseminated Germ-Cell Tumors with Cisplatin, Bleomycin, and either Vinblastine or EtoposideNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Alternating cycles of etoposide plus cisplatin and VAB-6 in the treatment of poor-risk patients with germ cell tumors.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1987
- High-dose cisplatin and VP-16 with bleomycin, in the management of advanced metastatic germ cell tumorsEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1986
- Current Optimum Management of Anaplastic Germ Cell Tumours of the Testis and Other SitesBritish Journal of Urology, 1986
- Vincristine, cisplatin, and bleomycin with surgery in the management of advanced metastatic nonseminomatous testis tumorsCancer, 1984
- Cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum, Vinblastine, and Bleomycin Combination Chemotherapy in Disseminated Testicular CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1977