Study newsletters, community and ethics advisory boards, and focus group discussions provide ongoing feedback for a large biobank
- 15 March 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
- Vol. 155 (4) , 737-741
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33896
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public Perspectives on Informed Consent for BiobankingAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2009
- Public Opinion about the Importance of Privacy in Biobank ResearchAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2009
- Community consultation and communication for a population‐based DNA biobank: The Marshfield clinic personalized medicine research projectAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2008
- Informed Consent for Biorepositories: Assessing Prospective Participants' Understanding and OpinionsCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2008
- Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus StatementPLoS Biology, 2008
- Beyond “misunderstanding”: Written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology studySocial Science & Medicine, 2007
- Community Engagement in Genetic Research: Results of the First Public Consultation for the Quebec CARTaGENE ProjectPublic Health Genomics, 2007
- Community Engagement and Informed Consent in the International HapMap ProjectPublic Health Genomics, 2007
- Informed Consent and Subject Motivation to Participate in a Large, Population-Based Genomics Study: The Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research ProjectPublic Health Genomics, 2006
- Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Genomic MedicineNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003