Bioimpedance analysis: evaluation of leg-to-leg system based on pressure contact foot-pad electrodes
- 1 April 1997
- journal article
- applied sciences
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 29 (4) , 524-531
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199704000-00015
Abstract
Conventional single frequency bioimpedance analysis (BIA) systems require technician placement of arm and leg gel electrodes, a suitable location for recumbent measurements, and a separate measurement of body weight. The aim of this study was to evaluate a new single frequency 50 kHz leg-to-leg bioimpedance analysis (BIA) system combined with a digital scale that employs stainless steel pressure-contact foot pad electrodes for standing impedance and body weight measurements. Healthy adults were evaluated for 1) electrode validity and 2) potential for body component estimation. Pressure-contact foot-pad electrode measured impedance was highly correlated with (N= 9, r = 0.99, P < 0.001) impedance measured using conventional gel electrodes applied to the plantar surface of both lower extremities; mean(±SD) impedance was systematically higher by about 15 ohms for pressure contact electrodes (526 ± 56 ohms vs 511 ± 59 ohms; P< 0.001). Second, the relationship between stature-adjusted leg-to-leg impedance (H2/Z) measured by the new system and two body composition components (total body water by 3H2O dilution (N = 144); and fat-free body mass, by underwater weighing and dual x-ray absorptiometry (N = 231)) was modeled using multiple regression analysis. Correlation coefficients for H2/Z alone versus body composition components were lower for leg-to-leg BIA than for arm-to-leg BIA: correlation coefficients and SEEs became similar for the leg-to-leg and arm-to-leg BIA systems with addition of three covariates (age, gender, and waist/hip circumference ratio) to regression models. The leg-to-leg pressure contact electrode BIA system has overall performance characteristics for impedance measurement and body composition analysis similar to conventional arm-to-leg gel electrode BIA and offers the advantage of increased speed and ease of measurement.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bioelectrical Impedance and Body Composition: Present Status and Future DirectionsNutrition Reviews, 2009
- Why bioelectrical impedance analysis should be used for estimating adiposityThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1996
- Techniques used in the measurement of body composition: an overview with emphasis on bioelectrical impedance analysisThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1996
- Multi-frequency impedance for the prediction of extracellular water and total body waterBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1995
- Fat-free mass estimation by the two-electrode impedance methodThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1990
- Body composition of humans: comparison of two improved four-compartment models that differ in expense, technical complexity, and radiation exposureThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1990
- Bioelectric Impedance for Body CompositionExercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 1990
- Estimation of body composition from bioelectric impedance of body segmentsThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1989
- Estimation of total body water by bioelectrical impedance analysisThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1986
- Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison StudiesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1983