Acuteness of Preoperative Factors to Predict Hearing Preservation in Acoustic Neuroma Surgery
- 2 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 110 (1) , 145-150
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200001000-00026
Abstract
To determine in patients with acoustic neuromas the predictive factors of hearing preservation according to clinical, radiological, and electrophysiological parameters and to evaluate, for each of these predictive factors, the percentage of patients with preserved hearing. The study involved 107 candidates for hearing preservation attempt. Mean age was 49.7 +/- 11.4 years. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were prospectively studied. Quantitative parameters were age, duration of functional complaints, hearing loss assessed by pure tone and speech audiometry, and auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). Qualitative parameters (expressed in percentage of presence) were sex, functional complaints, vestibular deficit revealed by vestibular testings, well-shaped ABRs, wave I, III, or V of ABRs, and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether their hearing was preserved (52.3%) or not preserved (47.7%). First, quantitative and qualitative factors were compared between both groups to identify predictive factors. Second, all patients were considered together and the percentage of hearing preservation was determined according to the presence of each predictive factor. The results confirmed the predictive value of classic parameters such as preoperative hearing level, radiological data, and trace of ABRs. They also emphasized the predictive role of other parameters such as short duration of hearing loss, presence of wave III in ABRs, and presence of TEOAEs. The size of the tumor and the preoperative hearing levels are longstanding predictive factors of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery, and candidates for hearing preservation are therefore now selected according to these factors. This study added more recent predictive factors and, among the 10 factors identified as predictive, the most relevant to hearing preservation were the presence of TEOAEs (69.7%), short duration of hearing loss (66.7%), and presence of wave III in ABRs (66.7%).Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management of Vestibular Schwannomas (Acoustic Neuromas): The Value of Neurophysiology for Evaluation and Prediction of Auditory Function in 420 CasesNeurosurgery, 1997
- Management of 1000 Vestibular Schwannomas (Acoustic Neuromas): Hearing Function in 1000 Tumor ResectionsNeurosurgery, 1997
- Hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery: fact or fantasy?The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1995
- Hearing preservation in acoustic tumor surgery: Results and prognostic factorsThe Laryngoscope, 1995
- Preservation of facial, cochlear, and other nerve functions in acoustic neuroma treatmentOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 1994
- Hearing Preservation and Improvement of Auditory Brainstem Response Findings after Acoustic Neuroma SurgeryActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1994
- An Algorithm for the Management of Acoustic Neuromas regarding Age, Hearing, Tumor Size, and SymptomsOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 1993
- Hearing preservation in acoustic neurinoma surgeryJournal of Neurosurgery, 1992
- Acoustic Tumor Surgery: Prognostic Factors in Hearing ConservationJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1989
- Technique of Hearing Preservation in Small Acoustic NeuromasAnnals of Surgery, 1984