Electrophysiological analysis of neurogenic vasodilatation in the isolated lingual artery of the rabbit
Open Access
- 1 September 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Pharmacology
- Vol. 89 (1) , 163-171
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1986.tb11132.x
Abstract
1 The nature of neurogenic vasodilatation was investigated in isolated segments of rabbit lingual artery. In separate experiments membrane responses to nerve stimulation were studied by use of microelectrodes. 2 In the presence of guanethidine to block constrictor responses and noradrenaline to induce tone, field stimulation with trains of pulses (8 Hz for 0.5 to 4 s) produced vasodilatation. Atropine (10−6 M) reduced the relaxations to about 50% of the control values while the induced vasodilatations were potentiated by physostigmine. Tetrodotoxin (TTX, 10−7 M) blocked all nerve-evoked responses. These data suggest that there is a cholinergic and a non-cholinergic component of the vasodilatation produced by nerve stimulation in the rabbit lingual artery. 3 Single stimuli did not evoke electrophysiological responses. With parameters similar to those used in the mechanical studies, periarterial stimulation in the presence of guanethidine evoked membrane hyperpolarizations which achieved amplitudes of up to 11 mV. The ionophoretic application of acetylcholine (ACh) produced hyperpolarization. 4 The inhibitory junction potentials (i.j.ps) but not the ionophoretic-induced responses were blocked by TTX. The nerve-evoked and the ACh-induced hyperpolarizations were potentiated by physostigmine (5 × 10−7 M) and totally blocked by atropine (10−7 M). 5 I.j.ps and hyperpolarization to ionophoresis of ACh were recorded from arteries in which the endothelium had been removed by mechanical rubbing. Mechanical relaxation to field stimulation and ACh was observed in preparations without endothelium. 6 These data suggest that the cholinergic component of the neurogenic vasodilatation in the rabbit lingual artery is accompanied by hyperpolarization. The non-cholinergic component does not appear to possess an electrophysiological correlate. In addition, it seems that the action of nerve-released ACh is mediated by muscarinic receptors which are situated directly on the vascular smooth muscle cells.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- ARE JUNCTION POTENTIALS ESSENTIAL? DUAL MECHANISM OF SMOOTH MUSCLE CELL ACTIVATION BY TRANSMITTER RELEASED FROM AUTONOMIC NERVESQuarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology, 1986
- Neurogenic muscarinic vasodilation in the cat. An example of endothelial cell-independent cholinergic relaxation.Circulation Research, 1985
- Evidence that vasoactive intestinal polypeptide is a dilator transmitter to some cerebral and extracerebral cranial arteriesPeptides, 1984
- Role of endothelium in responses of vascular smooth muscle.Circulation Research, 1983
- VIP as a mediator of hexamethonium-sensitive, atropine-resistant vasodilation in the cat tongueActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1982
- Further evidence for a muscarinic component to the neural vasodilator innervation of cerebral and cranial extracerebral arteries of the cat.Circulation Research, 1982
- A comparative study of neuromuscular transmission in several mammalian muscular arteriesPflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, 1979
- Dual Vasoconstrictor and Vasodilator Innervation of the Uterine Arterial Supply in the Guinea PigCirculation Research, 1968
- The regeneration of aortic endotheliumThe Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 1958
- CEREBRAL VASODILATOR NERVES AND THEIR PATHWAY FROM THE MEDULLA OBLONGATAArchives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 1932