Nomograms are More Meaningful than Severity-Adjusted Institutional Comparisons for Reporting Outcomes
- 30 April 2006
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in European Urology
- Vol. 49 (4) , 600-603
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.033
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pre-Treatment Nomogram for Disease-Specific Survival of Patients with Chemotherapy-Naive Androgen Independent Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2006
- Does reporting of coronary artery bypass grafting from administrative databases accurately reflect actual clinical outcomes?The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2005
- Patients' Preferences for Technical versus Interpersonal Quality When Selecting a Primary Care PhysicianHealth Services Research, 2005
- Impact of the choice of benchmark on the conclusions of hospital report cardsAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Health plan quality-of-care information is undermined by voluntary reportingAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2003
- Assessing the Comparability of Various Measures of the Quality of Ambulatory CareMedical Care, 2002
- Cardiac surgery report cards: comprehensive review and statistical critiqueThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- A Preoperative Nomogram for Disease Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1998
- The risks of risk adjustmentJAMA, 1997
- Informing Consumer Decisions in Health Care: Implications from Decision‐Making ResearchThe Milbank Quarterly, 1997