Comparison of Bipolar Atrial Electrogram Amplitude in Sinus Rhythm, Atrial Fibrillation, and Atrial Flutter
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 19 (2) , 150-156
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03306.x
Abstract
Automatic mode switching pacemakers revert to non‐atrial tracking modes in response to sensed atrial tachyarrhythmias. It is unclear how atrial electrogram amplitudes in sinus rhythm compare to those during atrial tachyarrhythmias. In this study, peak‐to‐peak bipolar atrial electrogram amplitudes were measured during sinus rhythm and either atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in 69 patients. The mean atrial electrogram amplitudes were 1,59 ± 1.36 m V during sinus rhythm and 0.77 ± 0,58 mV during atrial fibrillation (P < 0.0001) for 25 patients with atrial fibrillation and 1.81 ± 2.07 mV during sinus and 1.5 ± 1.81 mV(P < 0.0001) for 44 patients with atrial flutter. The mean electrogram amplitudes during both atrial fibrillation and flutter correlated significantly with amplitudes during sinus rhythm (R = 0.79, R = 0.94. respectively, both P < 0,0001). The coefficient of variance of individual electrogram amplitudes was greater in atrial fibrillation than sinus (P < 0.0001). By comparing 20th percentile electrogram amplitudes in atrial fibrillation and flutter to mean sinus amplitudes, intermittent very low electrogram amplitudes (< 0.3 mV) were more likely during atrial fibrillation and flutter if the mean sinus electrogram amplitudes were < 1.5 mV and < 0.5 mV, respectively (P < 0.01). Eightieth percentile electrogram amplitude values in atrial fibrillation and flutter were equally likely to exceed mean sinus amplitude values in respective patients, in conclusion, mean atrial electrogram amplitudes during atrial fibrillation and flutter are less than but correlated to sinus rhythm electrogram amplitudes. Very low amplitude individual electrograms during these atrial arrhythmias are associated with low mean sinus rhythm electrogram amplitudes. These findings may have implications for the programming of permanent dual chamber pacemakers in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and flutter.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dual Chamber, Rate Adaptive Pacing in Patients with Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias: Protective Measures for Rate ControlPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1993
- Atrial Arrhythmia Management with Sensor Controlled Atrial Refractory Period and Automatic Mode Switching in Patients with Minute Ventilation Sensing Dual Chamber Rate Adaptive PacemakersPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1992
- DDD pacing mode survival in patients with a dual-chamber pacemakerJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Morbidity and Mortality of Patients with Sinus Node Disease: Comparative Effects of Atrial and Ventricular PacingPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- A New Feature for Control of Inappropriate High Rate Tracking in DDDR PacemakersPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- DDD Pacing: An Effective Treatment Modality for Recurrent Atrial ArrhythmiasPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: Effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortalityAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakersThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Tracking of Atrial Flutter During DDD Pacing: Another Form of Pacemaker‐Mediated TachycardiaPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1984
- Changing experience with dual chamber (DDD) pacemakersJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1984