Incidence of Roentgen Contrast Medium Reactions after Intravenous Injection in Pre-Registration Trials and Post-Marketing Surveillances
- 1 May 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Acta Radiologica
- Vol. 34 (3) , 210-213
- https://doi.org/10.1177/028418519303400302
Abstract
The relative risk of adverse drug reactions of ionic versus non-ionic contrast media injected i.v. were compared for different types of trials using odds-ratio. The absolute and relative risk found in large post-marketing trials were compared with that found in the iohexol pre-registration trials. The absolute risks were 2 to 10 times higher in the pre-registration trials compared to the post-marketing surveillances. The relative risk for all adverse drug reactions was 3 to 6 times higher for ionic vs. non-ionic media and independent of pre- or post-registration studies. The odds-ratio seems to be a feasible method of comparing the relative risk of adverse reactions in various trials.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Safety of High-Osmolality and Low-Osmolality Radiographic Contrast AgentsInvestigative Radiology, 1992
- Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media.Radiology, 1990
- A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effectsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1989
- Adverse Reactions following Two Separate Intravascular Injections of Contrast Media in the Same PatientActa Radiologica, 1987