The Theory/Practice Divide: Bridging the Gap in Occupational Therapy
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in British Journal of Occupational Therapy
- Vol. 59 (6) , 264-268
- https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269605900604
Abstract
Recent research has highlighted students' and new practitioners' perceptions of a theory/practice divide. In reviewing the literature on types of knowledge and their use in different contexts, a number of possible explanations for the divide emerge concerning the relationship of theory to practice. The extent to which changing patterns of fieldwork practice and clinical reasoning strategies are bridging the divide is explored. This suggests that emancipatory knowledge is possible by these educational routes but has yet to fulfil its full potential because of historical, professional and institutional constraints.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Problem-Based Learning Curriculum for Occupational Therapy EducationAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1995
- Profession and life: Separate worldsSocial Science & Medicine, 1994
- Experience is the Best Teacher; or is it? An Analysis of the Role of Experience in Learning to TeachJournal of Teacher Education, 1994
- A Dose of Reality: Understanding the Origin of the Theory/Practice Dichotomy in Teacher Education from the Students' Point of ViewJournal of Teacher Education, 1993
- Engaging Teachers in Emancipatory Knowledge ConstructionJournal of Teacher Education, 1992
- What is Clinical Reasoning?American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1991
- The importance of practical knowledge and implications for continuing educationJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 1990
- Documenting reflection‐in‐action in the classroom: searching for appropriate methodsInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1989
- Knowledge creation and knowledge use in professioal contextsStudies in Higher Education, 1985
- Education and thinking: The role of knowledge.American Psychologist, 1984