The Prevalence and Estimates of the Cumulative Incidence of Hospital-Acquired Infections Among Patients Admitted to Auckland District Health Board Hospitals in New Zealand
- 2 January 2003
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 24 (1) , 56-61
- https://doi.org/10.1086/502116
Abstract
Objectives:To report the pooled results of seven prevalence surveys of hospital-acquired infections conducted between November 1996 and November 1999, and to use the data to predict the cumulative incidence of hospital-acquired infections in the same patient group.Design:The summary and modeling of data gathered from the routine surveillance of the point prevalence of hospital-acquired infections.Setting:Auckland District Health Board Hospitals (Auckland DHBH), the largest publicly funded hospital group in New Zealand supplying secondary and tertiary services.Patients:All inpatients.Method:Point-prevalence surveys were conducted including all patients in Auckland DHBH. Standard definitions of hospital-acquired infection were used. The data from the seven surveys were pooled and used in a modeling exercise to predict the cumulative incidence of hospital-acquired infection. An existing method for the conversion of prevalence to cumulative incidence was applied. Results are presented for all patients and stratified by clinical service and site of hospital-acquired infection.Results:The underlying patterns of hospital-acquired infection by site and service were stable during the seven time periods. The prevalence rate for all patients was 9.5%, with 553 patients identified with one or more hospital-acquired infections from a population of 5,819. The predicted cumulative incidence for all patients was 6.33% (95% confidence interval, 6.20% to 6.46%).Conclusions:The prevalence and the predicted cumulative incidence are similar to rates reported in the international literature. The validity of the predicted cumulative incidence derived here is not known. If it were accurate, then the application of this method would represent a cost-effective alternative to incidence studies.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- An economic model to assess the cost and benefits of the routine use of silver alloycoated urinary catheters to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections in catheterized patientsJournal of Hospital Infection, 2001
- The rate and cost of hospital-acquired infections occurring in patients admitted to selected specialties of a district general hospital in England and the national burden imposedJournal of Hospital Infection, 2001
- Converting Incidence and Prevalence Data of Nosocomial Infections Results From Eight HospitalsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2001
- The Second National Prevalence Survey of Infection in Hospitals—overview of the resultsJournal of Hospital Infection, 1996
- Nosocomial Candidemia: Risk Factors and Attributable MortalityClinical Infectious Diseases, 1995
- Prevalence of hospital-acquired infections in SpainJournal of Hospital Infection, 1992
- CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988American Journal of Infection Control, 1988
- An international survey of the prevalence of hospital-acquired infectionJournal of Hospital Infection, 1988
- THE EFFICACY OF INFECTION SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL PROGRAMS IN PREVENTING NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS IN US HOSPITALSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- INCIDENCE AND PREVALENCE AS USED IN THE ANALYSIS OF THE OCCURRENCE OF NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1981