Ethics at the end of life
- 1 May 1986
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 1 (3) , 170-176
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02602333
Abstract
Some of the physician’s most difficult decisions involve whether to give cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Current research, hospital policies, and case law provide little guidance for these decisions, but medical ethics offers three useful principles. All three are based on patients’ wishes. First, a victim of cardiopulmonary arrest should receive CPR unless compelling reasons indicate he would not want it. Second, a patient has the right to refuse CPR. Finally, if CPR will serve no therapeutic goals defined from the patient’s wishes, it should not be given. Applying these principles requires a sympathetic, directed history which elicits the patient’s wishes relevant to resuscitation. This article uses an actual case and a simple algorithm to show how these principles promote ethically sound resuscitation decisions.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Providers as predictorsCritical Care Medicine, 1986
- Decision Making for Incompetent Patients by Designated ProxyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Choices about Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Survival after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Law and the Life Sciences: CPR: When the Beat Should StopHastings Center Report, 1982
- Audiometry in industry.BMJ, 1978
- How Much Sense Is There in an Attempt to Resuscitate an Aged Person?Gerontology, 1978
- Letter to the EditorContact Dermatitis, 1976
- Structure-activity Relationships among Insecticidal Compounds derived from ChlordeneNature, 1965
- Spontaneous Regression of CancerBMJ, 1960