Delivered dose of renal replacement therapy and mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 15 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Critical Care
- Vol. 13 (2) , R57
- https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7784
Abstract
Introduction: The optimal dialysis dose for the treatment of acute kidney injury (AKI) is controversial. We sought to evaluate the relationship between renal replacement therapy (RRT) dose and outcome. Methods: We performed a prospective multicentre observational study in 30 intensive care units (ICUs) in eight countries from June 2005 to December 2007. Delivered RRT dose was calculated in patients treated exclusively with either continuous RRT (CRRT) or intermittent RRT (IRRT) during their ICU stay. Dose was categorised into more-intensive (CRRT ≥ 35 ml/kg/hour, IRRT ≥ 6 sessions/week) or less-intensive (CRRT < 35 ml/kg/hour, IRRT < 6 sessions/week). The main outcome measures were ICU mortality, ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. Results: Of 15,200 critically ill patients admitted during the study period, 553 AKI patients were treated with RRT, including 338 who received CRRT only and 87 who received IRRT only. For CRRT, the median delivered dose was 27.1 ml/kg/hour (interquartile range (IQR) = 22.1 to 33.9). For IRRT, the median dose was 7 sessions/week (IQR = 5 to 7). Only 22% of CRRT patients and 64% of IRRT patients received a more-intensive dose. Crude ICU mortality among CRRT patients were 60.8% vs. 52.5% (more-intensive vs. less-intensive groups, respectively). In IRRT, this was 23.6 vs. 19.4%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, there was no significant association between RRT dose and ICU mortality (Odds ratio (OR) more-intensive vs. less-intensive: CRRT OR = 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.66 to 2.21; IRRT OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 0.48 to 4.67). Among survivors, shorter ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation were observed in the more-intensive RRT groups (more-intensive vs. less-intensive for all: CRRT (median): 15 (IQR = 8 to 26) vs. 19.5 (IQR = 12 to 33.5) ICU days, P = 0.063; 7 (IQR = 4 to 17) vs. 14 (IQR = 5 to 24) ventilation days, P = 0.031; IRRT: 8 (IQR = 5.5 to 14) vs. 18 (IQR = 13 to 35) ICU days, P = 0.008; 2.5 (IQR = 0 to 10) vs. 12 (IQR = 3 to 24) ventilation days, P = 0.026). Conclusions: After adjustment for multiple variables, these data provide no evidence for a survival benefit afforded by higher dose RRT. However, more-intensive RRT was associated with a favourable effect on ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation among survivors. This result warrants further exploration. Trial Registration: Cochrane Renal Group (CRG110600093).Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intensity of Renal Support in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney InjuryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Standard versus High-Dose CVVHDF for ICU-Related Acute Renal FailureJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2008
- Dialysis dose in acute kidney injury: no time for therapeutic nihilism – a critical appraisal of the Acute Renal Failure Trial Network studyCritical Care, 2008
- The valuable contribution of observational studies to nephrologyKidney International, 2007
- Management of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney InjuryClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2007
- North East Italian Prospective Hospital Renal Outcome Survey on Acute Kidney Injury (NEiPHROS-AKI)Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2007
- Dose of Dialysis in Acute Renal FailureClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2006
- Acute renal failureThe Lancet, 2005
- Acute renal failureThe Lancet, 2005
- Economic Aspects of Severe SepsisPharmacoEconomics, 2004