Division of labour and colony efficiency in social insects: effects of interactions between genetic architecture, colony kin structure and rate of perturbations
- 29 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 273 (1595) , 1815-1823
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3513
Abstract
The efficiency of social insect colonies critically depends on their ability to efficiently allocate workers to the various tasks which need to be performed. While numerous models have investigated the mechanisms allowing an efficient colony response to external changes in the environment and internal perturbations, little attention has been devoted to the genetic architecture underlying task specialization. We used artificial evolution to compare the performances of three simple genetic architectures underlying within-colony variation in response thresholds of workers to five tasks. In the 'deterministic mapping' system, the thresholds of individuals for each of the five tasks is strictly genetically determined. In the second genetic architecture ('probabilistic mapping'), the genes only influence the probability of engaging in one of the tasks. Finally, in the 'dynamic mapping' system, the propensity of workers to engage in one of the five tasks depends not only on their own genotype, but also on the behavioural phenotypes of other colony members. We found that the deterministic mapping system performed well only when colonies consisted of unrelated individuals and were not subjected to perturbations in task allocation. The probabilistic mapping system performed well for colonies of related and unrelated individuals when there were no perturbations. Finally, the dynamic mapping system performed well under all conditions and was much more efficient than the two other mapping systems when there were perturbations. Overall, our simulations reveal that the type of mapping between genotype and individual behaviour greatly influences the dynamics of task specialization and colony productivity. Our simulations also reveal complex interactions between the mode of mapping, level of within-colony relatedness and risk of colony perturbations.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pleiotropy, Epistasis and New QTL: The Genetic Architecture of Honey Bee Foraging BehaviorJournal of Heredity, 2004
- Emergent Polyethism as a Consequence of Increased Colony Size in Insect SocietiesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2002
- Genetic dissection of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) foraging behaviorJournal of Heredity, 2000
- Fixed Response Thresholds and the Regulation of Division of Labor in Insect SocietiesBulletin of Mathematical Biology, 1998
- Genetic effects on task performance, but not on age polyethism, in a swarm-founding eusocial waspAnimal Behaviour, 1998
- Response threshold reinforcements and division of labour in insect societiesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1998
- Indiscriminate altruism: unduly nice parents and siblingsTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1997
- ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATION: Insights from Fire Ants and Other Highly Eusocial InsectsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1995
- Regulation of Division of Labor in Insect SocietiesAnnual Review of Entomology, 1992
- Hormonal and Genetic Control of Behavioral Integration in Honey Bee ColoniesScience, 1989