The Seniority System in Congress
- 1 June 1959
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 53 (2) , 412-436
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1952154
Abstract
The seniority system ordinarily rates no more than two or three pages in books devoted to Congress. There is likely to be a brief description and a weighing of the arguments, pro and con, followed generally by the conclusion that the system is a poor one; occasionally an author will defend it stoutly. Regardless of the conclusions, the analyses are rarely thorough. This article attempts to fill a gap in the literature on Congress by describing and analyzing various aspects of its seniority system.It is well to remember at the outset that very few human institutions ignore seniority entirely. Champ Clark, in his autobiography, noted that it is observed in all the affairs of life:No sane man would for one moment think of making a graduate from West Point a full general, or one from Annapolis an admiral, or one from any university or college chief of a great newspaper, magazine or business house. A priest or a preacher who has just taken orders is not immediately made a bishop, archbishop or cardinal. In every walk of life “men must tarry at Jericho till their beards are grown.”Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The American CongressHarvard Law Review, 1960
- The United States Congress: Organization and ProcedureThe Western Political Quarterly, 1950
- The Constitution of the United States, American Parties and Elections, The Speaker of the House of Representatives since 1896 and Congressional InvestigationsInternational Affairs, 1929
- Congress: An ExplanationThe Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 1927
- CongressPublished by Harvard University Press ,1926