Associative learning of plant odorants activating the same or different receptor neurones in the moth Heliothis virescens
Open Access
- 15 February 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Experimental Biology
- Vol. 208 (4) , 787-796
- https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01431
Abstract
SUMMARY The importance of olfactory learning in host plant selection is well demonstrated in insects, including the heliothine moths. In the present study olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension response was performed to determine the moths9 ability to learn and discriminate three plant odorants:β -ocimene and β-myrcene (activating the same receptor neurone type), and racemic linalool (activating two different types). The conditioned stimulus (CS) was an air puff with each odorant blown into a constant air stream and over the antennae, and the unconditioned stimulus (US) was sucrose solution applied first to the antennal taste sensilla, then to the proboscis. Conditioning with increasing odorant concentrations induced increased learning performance. The concentration threshold for learning was 100 times lower for racemic linalool than for the two other odorants, a fact that can be correlated with a higher sensitivity of the moths9 antennae to racemic linalool as shown in electroantennogram recordings. After correcting for the different odour sensitivities, the moths9 ability to discriminate the odorants was studied. Differential conditioning experiments were carried out, in which moths had to distinguish between a rewarded (CS+) odorant and an explicitly unrewarded odorant (CS-), choosing odour concentrations giving the same learning rate in previous experiments. The best discrimination was found with β-myrcene as the rewarded odorant and racemic linalool as the unrewarded. The opposite combination gave lower discrimination, indicating a higher salience for β-myrcene than for racemic linalool. The moths could also discriminate betweenβ -ocimene and β-myrcene, which was surprising, since they activate the same receptor neurone type. No difference in salience was found between these two odorants.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- 10.1023/A:1021280201479Published by Test accounts ,2011
- 10.1023/A:1003598301272Published by Test accounts ,2011
- Altered Representation of the Spatial Code for Odors after Olfactory Classical ConditioningNeuron, 2004
- Side-specific olfactory conditioning leads to more specific odor representation between sides but not within sides in the honeybee antennal lobesNeuroscience, 2003
- Olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension in bumble beesEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1999
- Olfactory conditioning in the honey bee, Apis mellifera: Effects of odor intensityPhysiology & Behavior, 1997
- Olfactory Conditioning in the Moth Heliothis virescensThe Science of Nature, 1996
- Discrimination of oilseed rape volatiles by honey bee: Novel combined gas chromatographic-electrophysiological behavioral assayJournal of Chemical Ecology, 1994
- A learning‐related variation in electroantennogram responses of a parasitic waspPhysiological Entomology, 1990
- Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1983