Indirect comparison: relative risk fallacies and odds solution
- 1 October 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 62 (10) , 1031-1036
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Natalizumab for Relapsing Multiple SclerosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Indirect comparisons of competing interventionsHealth Technology Assessment, 2005
- Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Can we individualize the ‘number needed to treat’? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analysesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Choice of effect measure for epidemiological dataJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2000
- Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analysesStatistics in Medicine, 2000
- Antithrombotic Therapy To Prevent Stroke in Patients with Atrial FibrillationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- Placebo maniaBMJ, 1996
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Shall We Count the Living or the Dead?New England Journal of Medicine, 1958