Who Gets Revoked? A Comparison of Intensive Supervision Successes and Failures in Vermont
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Crime & Delinquency
- Vol. 43 (1) , 104-118
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128797043001006
Abstract
Little research exists on differences between intensive community supervision successes and failures. One of the reasons for this scarcity of information is that a narrow range of criteria is often used to select candidates for such programs, hence differences among those who succeed and those who fail are difficult to discern. This research examined differences between successes and failures using a more heterogeneous population—offenders placed on furlough in preparation for release from incarceration in Vermont. The main finding was that the offender most likely to fail was the same offender likely to be selected for intensive community supervision.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deviating from the Mean: The Declining Significance of SignificanceJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1994
- A Comparison of Recidivism of Florida's Community Control and Prison: A Five-Year Survival AnalysisJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1993
- Characteristics Associated with Successful Adjustment to SupervisionCriminal Justice and Behavior, 1992
- THE NEW PENOLOGY: NOTES ON THE EMERGING STRATEGY OF CORRECTIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS*Criminology, 1992
- Focusing on High-Risk Parolees: An Experiment to Reduce Commitments to the Texas Department of CorrectionsJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1992
- Stated and Latent Functions of ISPCrime & Delinquency, 1990
- Reintegrating the Concept of Community into Community-Based CorrectionsCrime & Delinquency, 1989
- Temporary Prison ReleaseCrime & Delinquency, 1971