How good are our best models? Jackknifing, bootstrapping, and earthquake depth
- 16 May 1989
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Eos
- Vol. 70 (20) , 593-606
- https://doi.org/10.1029/89eo00156
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multi‐trace deconvolution with unknown trace scale factors: Omnilinear inversion of P and S waves for source time functionsGeophysical Research Letters, 1989
- Rupture extent of the 1978 Miyagi‐Oki, Japan, earthquake and seismic coupling in the northern Honshu Subduction ZoneGeophysical Research Letters, 1988
- Maximum-likelihood event magnitude estimation with bootstrapping for uncertainty estimationBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1988
- On the evaluation of geophysical modelsGeophysical Journal International, 1987
- Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of modelsJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1985
- Complex distribution of large thrust and normal fault earthquakes in the Chilean subduction zoneGeophysical Journal International, 1983
- Computer-Intensive Methods in StatisticsScientific American, 1983
- A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and Cross-ValidationThe American Statistician, 1983
- The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling PlansPublished by Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics (SIAM) ,1982
- Computers and the Theory of Statistics: Thinking the UnthinkableSIAM Review, 1979