Enhancing Focus Group Validity With Computer-Assisted Technology in Social Science Research
- 1 July 1991
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Social Science Computer Review
- Vol. 9 (2) , 231-245
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089443939100900204
Abstract
The use of focus groups as a qualitative research method has received criticism, particularly concerning its lack of predictive validity. However, it has also been lauded for providing rich and in-depth information. This study sought to enhance focus group research results by combining a computer-assisted technology (Continuous Attitudinal Response Technology, CARTtm) and social scientific data collection techniques (national poll) in testing subjects' responses to Proposition 103, an insurance industry regulating initiative.1 Excerpts from television commercials, newscasts, and talk shows constituted the stimuli for focus group subjects. Results from use of the CARTtm system with focus group subjects confirmed those derived from the national poll, regarding the insurance controversy. However, processes inherent in the CARTtm technology allowed for more in-depth analysis and interpretation than the survey technique alone. Keywords: Computer, social science, continuous attitudinal response technology, survey methods, insurance, validity.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Manager Decisions Based on Communication Facilitated in Focus GroupsManagement Communication Quarterly, 1989
- Against the Quantitative-Qualitative Incompatibility Thesis or Dogmas Die HardEducational Researcher, 1988
- How are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical ModelAmerican Political Science Review, 1987
- Effects of Quality and Quantity of Information on Decision EffectivenessJournal of Consumer Research, 1987
- Ideology and Decision Making for American City ManagersUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1987
- Assessing the Accuracy of Polls and SurveysScience, 1986
- Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.American Psychologist, 1980
- Focus Groups and the Nature of Qualitative Marketing ResearchJournal of Marketing Research, 1977