The will to conservation: A Burkeian analysis of dust bowl rhetoric and American farming motives
- 30 December 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Southern Speech Communication Journal
- Vol. 52 (1) , 1-21
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948609372676
Abstract
The 1930s Dust Bowl has been accepted as the worst environmental disaster in United States history. Analysis of the rhetoric of agricultural conservationists which focuses on this issue reveals that its potential for promoting environmentally sound land‐use practices was limited. This essay relies on Kenneth Burke's theory of identification and pentadic ratios to identify the hierarchy of motives associated with land use. I argue that the vulnerability of conservation efforts to competing forces was largely a function of that hierarchy and suggests that an action‐oriented perspective would be more conducive to responsible land use.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conservationism vs. preservationism: The “public interest” in the Hetch Hetchy controversyQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1984
- John Muir, Yosemite, and the sublime response: A study in the rhetoric of preservationismQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1981
- MEANING THROUGH METAPHOR: ANALOGY AS EPISTEMOLOGYAnnals of the American Association of Geographers, 1981
- A Grammar of MotivesPublished by University of California Press ,1969
- Set theory: Key to the understanding, of Kenneth Burke's use of the term “identification”Western Speech, 1969
- On viewing rhetoric as epistemicCentral States Speech Journal, 1967
- The Dust Storms of 1954Scientific American, 1954