Weight loss in overweight subjects following low-sucrose or sucrose-containing diets
- 2 August 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Obesity
- Vol. 25 (8) , 1122-1128
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801652
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the response by overweight individuals, counselled in a work environment, to energy-reduced diets in which the amount of sucrose-containing foods is varied. DESIGN: Two energy-reduced diets were designed as a weight-reducing programme. A low-sugar diet (LSD) providing 5% of its energy from sucrose and a sugar-containing diet (SCD) providing 10% of its energy from sucrose incorporated as sweet foods were devised. Both diets were constructed to contain about 33% of the energy from fat. The diets, designed to provide a deficit of 2.51 MJ/day (600 kcal/day) per individual, were randomly allocated to subjects in an 8 week parallel design study. SUBJECTS: Ninety-five subjects were recruited from a large service industry if they were more than 7 kg (1 stone) in weight above body mass index (BMI) 25 kg/m2. Sixty-eight subjects completed the programme. MEASUREMENTS: Fortnightly body weight measurements were taken using calibrated scales; BMI at baseline and week 8; and nutrient intake using 2 day food record diaries at baseline and weeks 2, 4 and 8. RESULTS: Weight loss over the 8 weeks was 2.2 kg (LSD) and 3.0 kg (SCD). BMI changed from 29.2 on the LSD and 30.1 kg/m2 SCD at baseline to 28.2 and 28.8 kg/m2 at week 8 respectively. The actual prescribed commercially added sucrose intakes were 5% energy (LSD) or 10% energy (SCD). Reported percentage energy from fat was significantly lower on the SCD (and would seem to support the theory of an inverse relationship between fat and sugar) than on the LSD, where there was seen to be no significant reduction. There was no evidence of micronutrient dilution that could be directly attributed to the sucrose content of the diets. CONCLUSION: These results provide no justification for the exclusion of added sucrose in weight-reducing diets.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of different types of dietary advice on body composition in a group of Scottish menJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 1998
- The sugar–fat relationship revisited: differences in consumption between men and women of varying BMIInternational Journal of Obesity, 1998
- Hypothesis: parents may selectively restrict sugar-containing foods for pre-school children with a high BMIInternational Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 1998
- Replacement of dietary fat by sucrose or starch: Effects on 14 d ad libitum energy intake, energy expenditure and body weight in formerly obese and never-obese subjectsInternational Journal of Obesity, 1997
- Do diets high in sugars compromise micronutrient intakes? Micronutrient intakes in the Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults according to dietary concentration of ‘added’, ‘non‐milk extrinsic’ or ‘total’ sugarsJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 1997
- Randomised comparison of diets for maintaining obese subjects' weight after major weight loss: ad lib, low fat, high carbohydrate dietv fixed energy intakeBMJ, 1997
- The effect of sucrose- and aspartame-sweetened drinks on energy intake, hunger and food choice of female, moderately restrained eatersInternational Journal of Obesity, 1997
- Obesity in Britain: gluttony or sloth?BMJ, 1995
- R. A. McCanceProceedings of the Nutrition Society, 1993
- A new method of energy prescription to improve weight lossJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 1991