Guidelines are not enough: The need for written sentencing opinions

This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:

• Is Plea Bargaining Inevitable?
  Harvard Law Review, 1984
• Real Offense Sentencing: The Model Sentencing and Corrections Act
  The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 1981
• Due Process at Sentencing: An Empirical and Legal Analysis of the Disclosure of Presentence Reports in Federal Courts
  Harvard Law Review, 1980
• Due Process of Sentencing
  University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1980
• Sentencing Reform and Prosecutorial Power: A Critique of Recent Proposals for "Fixed" and "Presumptive" Sentencing
  University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1978
• Search for Sentencing Equity: Sentence Review in Massachusetts and Connecticut
  American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 1977
• The Future of Sentencing Reform: Emerging Legal Issues in the Individualization of Justice
  Michigan Law Review, 1975
• Sentencing Councils: A Study of Sentence Disparity and Its Reduction
  The University of Chicago Law Review, 1975
• The Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining
  The University of Chicago Law Review, 1968
• Appellate Review of Primary Sentencing Decisions: A Connecticut Case Study
  The Yale Law Journal, 1960