How Much Do You Weigh?: Determinants of Validity of Self-Reported Body Weight
- 1 August 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 69 (1) , 248-250
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1989.69.1.248
Abstract
Although researchers often employ self-report measures of current body weight, the validity of such self-reports remains questionable. The present experiment with 133 college women examined such self-reports under two conditions—reporting prior to unanticipated objective weighing (Order 1) versus reporting subsequent to weighing without weight disclosure (Order 2). Analysis indicated significantly less accurate, particularly underestimated, self-reports for Order 1 than for Order 2. Moreover, for Order 1 but not Order 2, under-reporting was disproportionately related to objectively heavier weight and was also predictable from lower personal weight ideals independent of actual weight. Findings and their implications for investigation were viewed from a social self-presentational framework.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of measured and self-reported weights in a 4-year follow-up of spouse involvement in obesity treatmentBehavior Therapy, 1985
- Correlational Study of Subjects' Self-Reported and Measured Heights and WeightsPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
- The accuracy of self-reported weightsThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1981
- Distortion in self-reported height and weight dataJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 1981
- Reliability and validity of self-report and observers' estimates of relative weightAddictive Behaviors, 1979
- The relationship between person's relative body weights and the quality and quantity of food stored in their homesAddictive Behaviors, 1978
- Childhood Antecedents of Adult ObesityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976