Long-term outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in patients with dysphagic stroke
Open Access
- 1 November 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Age and Ageing
- Vol. 27 (6) , 671-676
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/27.6.671
Abstract
Objective: investigation of length of survival, complications, level of dependence and recovery of swallow in patients who received percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding for dysphagia due to stroke. Design: a retrospective case note analysis of patients treated between 1991 and 1995 and telephone survey of modified Barthel index in October 1996. Setting: Cardiff Royal Infirmary and the University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff. Subjects: 126 patients who had PEG inserted after dysphagic stroke. Main outcome measures: complications of PEG, length of survival, duration of PEG feeding, recovery of swallow and modified Barthel index score. Results: median length of follow-up was 31 months (range 4–71). Median duration of PEG use was 127 days (range1–1372). For patients with PEG inserted within 2 weeks the median duration was 52 days (range 2–1478). At follow up 36 (29%) had had PEG removed, 72 (57%) had died with PEG in use, 10 (8%) still had PEG and were nil bymouth and five (4%) had PEG in use with swallow recovered. The median survival was 305 days. Thirty-five (28%) patients died in hospital. Aspiration pneumonia was the commonest complication. Thirty-three patients were alive in October 1996- The modified Barthel index for nursing home patients was 4 (range 0–13) and for patients at home 11 (range 2–20). Conclusion: PEG feeding is safe and well tolerated in patients with dysphagic stroke. Early PEG placement (within 2 weeks) is worthwhile with many going on to have long-term feeding. Although overall mortality is high, some patients have a long-term survival and a few attain a reasonable level of function in daily living activities. Late recovery of swallow occurs and patients should have follow-up swallowing assessment.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: