The perception of light—dark transitions
Open Access
- 18 October 1983
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences
- Vol. 303 (1116) , 523-536
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1983.0111
Abstract
Transitions between light and darkness are particularly important where these serve as Zeitgebers to synchronize circadian rhythms. A special case is photoperiodism, which depends on the accurate detection of light—dark transitions and on the coupling of this information to a timing mechanism that appears to be based on the circadian clock. Results from laboratory experiments are considered in relation to the natural changes experienced at dawn and dusk, and evidence is presented that the light—dark transitions that couple to the timing mechanism in short-day plants are perceived through changes in irradiance rather than through changes in light quality. It has been generally accepted that the light—dark transition is sensed by a decrease of P fr levels in darkness, whereas dark—light is sensed by the rapid formation of P fr in the light. However, P fr in light-grown plants appears to be rather stable and so changes in P fr level after transfer to darkness may not be a sufficiently accurate method of detecting the light—dark transition in photoperiodism. The paper reviews some of the evidence from photoperiodic experiments and concludes that the plant may discriminate between light and darkness through the continuous or intermittent formation o f ‘new’ P fr .Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Light-Mediated Movement of ChloroplastsAnnual Review of Plant Physiology, 1982
- ANALYSIS OF Pfr DESTRUCTION IN AMARANTHUS CAUDATUS L EVIDENCE FOR TWO POOLS OF PHYTOCHROME*Photochemistry and Photobiology, 1982
- PHYTOCHROME DESTRUCTION IN DARK ‐ AND LIGHT‐GROWN AMARANTHUS CAUDATUS SEEDLINGSPhotochemistry and Photobiology, 1981
- Light Rquirements for Photoperiodic Sensitivity in Cotyledons of Dark‐grown Pharbitis nilPhysiologia Plantarum, 1975
- Lengthening Versus Shortening Dark Periods and Blossoming in Sugar Cane as Affected by TemperaturePlant Physiology, 1968
- RHYTHMIC FLOWERING RESPONSES AND PHYTOCHROME CHANGES IN A SELECTION OF CHENOPODIUM RUBRUMCanadian Journal of Botany, 1965
- Conditions Determining Effects of Far-Red and Red Irradiations on Flowering Response of Pharbitis nilPlant Physiology, 1964
- EVIDENCE OF A REQUIREMENT FOR PHYTOCHROME-Pfr IN THE FLORAL INITIATION OF CHENOPODIUM RUBRUMCanadian Journal of Botany, 1963
- Rates of Change of Phytochrome as an Essential Factor Determining Photoperiodism in PlantsCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 1960
- Photoreversibility of Flower Initiation.Plant Physiology, 1956