Managed Competition in Health Care Reform: Just Another American Dream, or the Perfect Solution?
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Vol. 22 (2) , 106-120
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.1994.tb01283.x
Abstract
Throughout the post-World War II decades, the United States has wrestled in its own unique style with a problem that is shared by all modern societies: how to achieve a reasonably equitable distribution of health care, without losing control of total spending on health care, and without suffocating the delivery system with controls and regulations that inhibit technical progress. Because an equitable distribution of health care inevitably requires at least some government regulation, and because government regulations tend to impose rigidity on any system, it is widely believed in the United States (and elsewhere) that a trade-off actually exists between fairness in the distribution of care and the health system’s ability to innovate. This troublesome trade-off bedevils American policy makers to this day.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients At Risk: Health Reform And Risk AdjustmentHealth Affairs, 1994
- A Single-Payer System In Jackson Hole ClothingHealth Affairs, 1994
- Can Managed Competition Solve The Problems Of Market Failure?Health Affairs, 1993
- Reorganizing The Financial Flows In American Health CareHealth Affairs, 1993
- The Jackson Hole initiatives for a twenty‐first century American health care systemHealth Economics, 1992
- Hidden overhead costs: is Canada's system really less expensive?Health Affairs, 1992
- The Concentration of Health Expenditures: An UpdateHealth Affairs, 1992
- The United States: Breakthroughs and WasteJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1992
- Halfway Competitive Markets and Ineffective Regulation: The American Health Care SystemJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1988
- Consumer-Choice Health PlanNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978