A commentary on Indvik and Fitzpatrick's study of relationship defining communication
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Quarterly
- Vol. 34 (1) , 14-18
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378609369616
Abstract
This commentary argues that Indvik and Fitzpatrick's article, “Perceptions of Inclusion, Affiliation, and Control in Five Interpersonal Relationships,” presents an inappropriate conceptual and methodological approach to the study of relationship defining communication. Problems are most evident in: (1) the domain isolated to represent the themes of inclusion, control, and affection; and (2) the inattention to the interdependence established with communication between relationship partners.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The fundamental topoi of relational communicationCommunication Monographs, 1984
- INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND RELATIONAL INTERDEPENDENCES IN SOCIAL INTERACTIONHuman Communication Research, 1984
- RELATIONAL MESSAGES ASSOCIATED WITH NONVERBAL BEHAVIORSHuman Communication Research, 1984
- Attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction in communication processes: In pursuit of an ephemeral influenceCommunication Monographs, 1983
- THE ATTRACTION PARADIGM REVISITED Responses to Dissimilar OthersHuman Communication Research, 1983
- THE ROLE OF INITIAL CONVERSATIONS IN DETERMINING ATTRACTION TO SIMILAR AND DISSIMILAR STRANGERSHuman Communication Research, 1981
- Misunderstandings in marital communication: A study of couples' nonverbal communication.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- Perceptions of communication behavior associated with relationship termsCommunication Monographs, 1980
- DOMINEERINGNESS AND DOMINANCE: A TRANSACTIONAL VIEWHuman Communication Research, 1979