A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Artificial Intelligence and Law
- Vol. 4 (3-4) , 331-368
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00118496
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person gamesArtificial Intelligence, 1995
- A Formal Model of Legal ArgumentationRatio Juris, 1994
- Hard cases: A procedural approachArtificial Intelligence and Law, 1994
- Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible ArgumentationJournal of Logic and Computation, 1993
- How to reason defeasiblyArtificial Intelligence, 1992
- Conditional entailment: Bridging two approaches to default reasoningArtificial Intelligence, 1992
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementationArtificial Intelligence, 1992
- A skeptical theory of inheritance in nonmonotonic semantic networksArtificial Intelligence, 1990
- A Fixpoint Semantics for Ordered LogicJournal of Logic and Computation, 1990
- Defeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inferenceComputational Intelligence, 1987