Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user
- 27 August 2003
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 114 (3) , 1565-1574
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1603765
Abstract
Experiments were conducted with a single, bilateral cochlear implant user to examine interaural level and time-delay cues that putatively underlie the design and efficacy of bilateral implant systems. The subject’s two implants were of different types but custom equipment allowed presentation of controlled bilateral stimuli, particularly those with specified interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD) cues. A lateralization task was used to measure the effect of these cues on the perceived location of the sensations elicited. For trains of fixed-amplitude, biphasic current pulses at 100 pps, the subject demonstrated sensitivity to an ITD of 300 μs, providing evidence of access to binaural information. The choice of bilateral electrode pair greatly influenced ITD sensitivity, suggesting that electrode pairings are likely to be an important consideration in the effort to provide binaural advantages. The selection of bilateral electrode pairs showing sensitivity to ITD was partially aided by comparisons of the pitch elicited by individual electrodes in each ear (when stimulated alone with fixed-amplitude current pulses at 813 pps): specifically, interaural electrodes with similar pitches were more likely (but not certain) to show ITD sensitivity. Significant changes in lateral position occurred with specific electrode pairs. With five bilateral electrode pairs of 14 tested, ITDs of 300 and 600 μs moved an auditory image significantly from right to left. With these same pairs, ILD changes of ≈11% of the dynamic range (in μApp) moved an auditory image from the far left to the far right—significantly farther than the nine pairs not showing significant ITD sensitivity. However, even these nine pairs did show response changes as a function of the interaural (or confounding monaural) level cue. Overall, insofar as the access to bilateral cues demonstrated herein generalizes to other subjects, it provides hope that the normal binaural advantages for speech recognition and sound localization can be made available to bilateral implant users.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Speech Understanding in Quiet and Noise in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant SystemEar & Hearing, 2002
- Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjectsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997
- Binaural interaction in a cochlear implant patientHearing Research, 1990
- A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years laterThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990
- Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: Spectral effectsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1981
- Lateral position and interaural discriminationThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977
- Single Auditory Units in the Superior Olivary Complex: II: Locations of Unit Categories and Tonotopic OrganizationInternational Journal of Neuroscience, 1972
- Acoustic-Image Lateralization Judgments with Binaural TonesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964
- Medial Geniculate Body—A DisavowalThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1958
- A place theory of sound localization.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1948